11-plus-Witness-for-the-Prosecution-MCQ
Witness for the Prosecution (1957) - Question Paper
Test Your Deep Knowledge of Dialogue, Story, and Language
1. What does Sir Wilfrid Robarts mean when he describes Leonard Vole as "disarming"?
- A. Highly persuasive in arguments.
- B. Physically unarmed during trial.
- C. Dangerous and alarming.
- D. Charming and non-threatening in demeanor.
- E. Completely unreliable.
2. When Christine responds to Sir Wilfrid, "I am not a number, I am a person," the tone can best be described as:
- A. Defensive and resolute.
- B. Detached and indifferent.
- C. Fearful and anxious.
- D. Humorous and lighthearted.
- E. Sarcastic and dismissive.
3. The expression "playing the devil's advocate," used by Sir Wilfrid during cross-examination, implies:
- A. Criticizing the opposing counsel harshly.
- B. Defending an unpopular idea for the sake of argument.
- C. Being directly aligned with the accused's viewpoint.
- D. Acting with deceitful intentions.
- E. Ensuring justice is upheld.
4. How does the idiom "the truth will out," used in the courtroom dialogue, function within the context of the trial?
- A. As a reassurance of eventual justice.
- B. As a threat to the witnesses.
- C. As a dismissal of circumstantial evidence.
- D. As a prediction of a biased verdict.
- E. As an acknowledgment of moral ambiguity.
5. What is the primary implication of Christine's testimony being described as "compelling"?
- A. It is persuasive despite factual discrepancies.
- B. It is dramatic and overacted.
- C. It is dismissed as irrelevant to the case.
- D. It is proven to be entirely truthful.
- E. It is inconclusive and vague.
6. The courtroom's description of Leonard Vole's alibi as "tenuous" implies it is:
- A. Surprisingly credible.
- B. Fabricated entirely.
- C. Weak and unreliable.
- D. Strong and corroborated.
- E. Questionable but plausible.
7. When Sir Wilfrid refers to the testimony as a "house of cards," he suggests it is:
- A. Strategically deceptive.
- B. Built on solid evidence.
- C. Fragile and easily dismantled.
- D. A well-structured argument.
- E. Deliberately misleading.
8. What is implied when Sir Wilfrid exclaims, "The plot thickens"?
- A. The defense strategy has failed.
- B. The case has been conclusively resolved.
- C. The jury has reached a verdict.
- D. The testimony lacks substance.
- E. New developments add complexity.
9. Christine's use of the term "scapegoat" signifies:
- A. A victim of circumstance.
- B. Someone unfairly blamed for others' faults.
- C. A person volunteering to take responsibility.
- D. The guilty party in the trial.
- E. A witness under pressure.
10. Sir Wilfrid's critique of the jury as "fallible" highlights:
- A. Their expertise in legal matters.
- B. Their unbiased perspective.
- C. Their susceptibility to errors.
- D. Their hesitance to deliver a verdict.
- E. Their inclination toward fairness.
11. Sir Wilfrid's reference to "poking holes in the prosecution's case" suggests:
- A. Exploiting weaknesses in their argument.
- B. Introducing new evidence.
- C. Harassing the witnesses.
- D. Strengthening the defense's alibi.
- E. Undermining the judge's authority.
12. Leonard's plea of innocence can be best described as:
- A. Evasive and ambiguous.
- B. Convincing and emotional.
- C. Overly rehearsed and insincere.
- D. Calm and understated.
- E. Exaggerated and manipulative.
13. The phrase "pulling the rug out from under" used in the trial means:
- A. Surprising someone with unexpected evidence.
- B. Ensuring the defense is well-prepared.
- C. Withdrawing support suddenly.
- D. Eliminating bias from the courtroom.
- E. Strengthening the prosecution's case.
14. When Sir Wilfrid describes Christine's demeanor as "impeccable," he implies she is:
- A. Flawless and beyond reproach.
- B. Manipulative and cunning.
- C. Unconvincing and weak.
- D. Eccentric and unpredictable.
- E. Transparent and honest.
15. The term "red herring" is used in the movie to signify:
- A. A misleading clue.
- B. An emotional testimony.
- C. A crucial piece of evidence.
- D. A question raised to confuse witnesses.
- E. A statement dismissed by the jury.
16. Leonard's lawyer describes his narrative as "incoherent," suggesting it is:
- A. Emotional but genuine.
- B. Deliberately misleading.
- C. Logical but contradictory.
- D. Chaotic and difficult to follow.
- E. Overwhelmingly persuasive.
17. Christine's statement that she is "not the sort to play second fiddle" reflects her:
- A. Confidence and self-assertion.
- B. Jealousy and insecurity.
- C. Doubt about the prosecution's case.
- D. Desire to remain uninvolved.
- E. Humility and modesty.
18. Sir Wilfrid's assertion that the "jury hangs on every word" suggests that the jury is:
- A. Skeptical of the arguments presented.
- B. Struggling to reach consensus.
- C. Completely captivated by the testimony.
- D. Distracted by inconclusive evidence.
- E. Unmoved by emotional appeals.
19. The courtroom's reaction to a "startling revelation" highlights:
- A. The judge's frustration.
- B. The witnesses' panic.
- C. A shift in the trial's direction.
- D. A reinforcement of the defense's claim.
- E. A dismissal of the evidence as trivial.
20. The description of the evidence as "circumstantial" indicates it is:
- A. Based on indirect connections.
- B. Conclusive and definitive.
- C. Weak but undeniable.
- D. Fabricated entirely.
- E. Irrelevant to the trial.
21. The prosecutor's argument is referred to as "airtight." This suggests it is:
- A. Completely free from flaws.
- B. Overly complicated and convoluted.
- C. Dismissed as irrelevant.
- D. Lacking substantial evidence.
- E. Susceptible to scrutiny.
22. When Sir Wilfrid mentions Christine's "duplicity," he is implying:
- A. Her testimony is honest and reliable.
- B. She has acted with deceitful intent.
- C. She is confused and indecisive.
- D. She is overly emotional.
- E. She is unwilling to cooperate.
23. The term "precarious" used to describe Leonard's situation conveys that it is:
- A. Logically sound.
- B. Strong and defensible.
- C. Entirely hopeless.
- D. Unimpressive but secure.
- E. Dangerous and unstable.
24. When the judge advises the jury to "weigh the evidence," the metaphor suggests they should:
- A. Disregard weak testimony.
- B. Consider the evidence carefully and objectively.
- C. Focus only on Christine's statement.
- D. Prioritize emotional appeals.
- E. Simplify the complexities of the case.
25. The "smoking gun" evidence referenced in the trial means:
- A. An irrefutable piece of evidence.
- B. A misleading clue introduced by the prosecution.
- C. A minor detail dismissed by the jury.
- D. A fabricated alibi offered by the defense.
- E. A potential turning point in the trial.
26. Christine's claim that Leonard "never killed anyone" suggests her:
- A. Absolute certainty of his innocence.
- B. Attempt to mislead the court.
- C. Lack of involvement in the case.
- D. Hidden doubts about his integrity.
- E. Emotional detachment from the trial.
27. Sir Wilfrid's comment that the case is "hanging by a thread" means it is:
- A. On the verge of collapsing.
- B. Well-supported by evidence.
- C. Completely fabricated.
- D. Resolved with finality.
- E. Strength
28. The defense's strategy being described as "meticulous" suggests it is:
- A. Thorough and carefully planned.
- B. Bold and overconfident.
- C. Incomplete and rushed.
- D. Deceptive and dishonest.
- E. Unlikely to succeed.
29. Christine's "stoic demeanor" during questioning reveals her:
- A. Unemotional and composed state.
- B. Evasive and uncooperative attitude.
- C. Overly nervous and anxious behavior.
- D. Dramatic and theatrical responses.
- E. Hidden guilt or shame.
30. The final verdict being labeled a "twist ending" implies it is:
- A. Expected and logical.
- B. Predictable but satisfying.
- C. Shocking and unforeseen.
- D. Ambiguous and unresolved.
- E. Overly dramatized.